Why Field Sobriety Tests Are Controversial
Field sobriety tests are common enough to be a cliche. Films and television shows often depict someone by the road having to test their balance. Meanwhile, an officer scrutinizes their every move.
Despite their widespread use, there are many questions about the reliability of FSTs. Factors unrelated to alcohol consumption can influence test results, raising serious questions about their fairness.
Read on to explore the origins, criticisms, and potential future of field sobriety tests. The details below might even play a substantial role for yourself or a loved one in court.
Historical Background
Field sobriety tests started in the early 1970s with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). This initiative sought to establish a standardized and objective method for assessing intoxication. They felt an urgent need to act due to the high rates of accidents associated with drunk driving.
The Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) battery introduced the earliest methods. It included the One-Leg Stand, Walk-and-Turn, and the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN). Over the decades, their application and the accuracy of their results continue to spark debates.
Scientific Reliability
The scientific reliability of field sobriety tests (FSTs) has been widely researched and debated. For example, the NHTSA asserted there was a 77% accuracy in detecting alcohol impairment in 2000.
However, even the tests deemed the most reliable have faced scrutiny. The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test has faced skepticism over its scientific validity. Factors like certain medications, fatigue, and natural eye anomalies can also cause nystagmus. Moreover, a 2007 review in the “Journal of Forensic Sciences” concluded that the HGN test needs additional evidence to remain valid.
Additionally, consider how the Walk-and-Turn and One-Leg Stand tests depend on someone’s physical condition. There are also external conditions, such as the surface they’re performed on, that matter. Variables like age, weight, and footwear can affect performance, leading to questions about their reliability.
Legal and Ethical Concerns
Field sobriety tests (FSTs) become marred by significant legal and ethical issues. These issues are chiefly due to their subjective nature and the potential for misuse. The results depend on the judgment of the administering officer, leading to inconsistencies and biased outcomes. These tests often form the basis for arrests that lead to job loss, financial strain, and public embarrassment.
Ethically, using FSTs involves balancing public safety with individual rights. While designed to prevent drunk driving and enhance safety, the risk of false positives can infringe on civil liberties. Additionally, the pressure to curb drunk driving might prompt law enforcement to misuse or overuse these tests. Ongoing scrutiny is essential for the fair use of FSTs and alignment with scientific and ethical standards.
Alternatives and Advances
Law enforcement agencies have responded to the challenges posed by traditional field sobriety tests. They often use more scientifically based methods like breathalyzers and blood tests.
Breathalyzers provide a quantifiable and objective measure of blood alcohol content (BAC) from a breath sample. It is a standard tool for confirming alcohol levels post-arrest. Blood tests, though more invasive, are considered the most accurate for detecting alcohol and other substances. They often get used when breathalyzer results are under dispute or drugs are suspected.
Advancements in technology have led to the development of sophisticated roadside testing equipment and mobile apps. Some areas are now using oral fluid testing devices that can detect drugs almost immediately. This shift toward more scientifically validated methods aims to increase the accuracy of impairment detection. As a result, they also reduce wrongful arrests and improve the fairness and efficiency of DUI enforcement.
Legal and scientific communities continue to advocate for adopting methods that provide objective and reproducible results. Innovations such as digital sobriety tests that evaluate cognitive and motor skills, and wearable technologies that continuously monitor BAC or drug levels, lead this shift. These advancements intend to equip law enforcement with tools that enhance the accuracy of testing and advance justice.
Consult a Local DUI Lawyer
Field sobriety tests are standard in DUI enforcement, but their effectiveness continues to be controversial. The shift towards scientifically backed methods like breathalyzers, blood tests, and advanced digital tools marks a significant move. However, there are potential legal challenges for any of these enforcement tools.
A local DUI attorney can assess what happened in your circumstances and fight for your rights. Our representatives stand by 24/7 and have connected over 5 million people to legal help in the U.S.
Call (866) 345-6784 or complete this quick form today!
